Press Corporate Sites

The Long Tail is crucial for companies with big inventories as an SEO tactic that enables them to draw customers to their websites and find products that may otherwise be buried in catalogues. But much may not change for small businesses with low quality products.

Filed under: Press SEO | Email to a Friend | Printer-Friendly | No Comments »

Spread the word:      

Taking the Netconcepts website from a traditional static “corporate brochure” to one where visitors can interact by posting comments on every page is a great example of Web 2.0 application says Stephan Spencer in an interview with the New Zealand Herald.

Filed under: Press SEO | Email to a Friend | Printer-Friendly | 2 Comments »

Spread the word:      

In this article written by Patricia Moore, author for NZ Marketing Magazine, Netconcepts makes the public scene, not for SEO, but for their marketing success.

Moore discusses how companies have had remarkable success in the competitive New Zealand export market. How are companies succeeding in this market? What or, perhaps more importantly, who should companies turn to in order to fuel their global success.

Filed under: Business Blogging Press Web Marketing | Email to a Friend | Printer-Friendly | No Comments »

Spread the word:      

After reading Netconcepts’ latest white paper, Chasing the Long Tail of Natural Search, during the August eTail conference in Philadelphia, PA, Catalog Success Associate Editor, Matt Griffin. Griffin wrote this article.

Griffin discusses why the (over discussed, under explained) 80/20 rule has such validity on search engine marketing of today’s business. He also summarizes Netconcepts’ key tactics to capturing the Long Tail of Natural Search.

Filed under: Long Tail Press SEO | Email to a Friend | Printer-Friendly | No Comments »

Spread the word:      

This article from the IT section of the Herald highlights five technology trends that are changing the face of retailing. Our own Stephan Spencer weighs in with his thoughts on where things are heading…

Filed under: Ecommerce Press | Email to a Friend | Printer-Friendly | No Comments »

Spread the word:      

They say that “Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.” But not if you’re a site owner! I’ve seen designs copied, content copied, even entire sites copied. It’s so easy for someone to “view source” and take whatever they like, without regard to copyright.

You can locate copyright infringers pretty easily with Copyscape if they’ve lifted some of your page copy. It’s much more difficult if they’ve limited their sticky fingers to just your design.

So far I’ve discovered by tip-off or by chance that our Netconcepts.com site design has been “pinched” at least 3 times. One of them was a fairly big company. More than a year and they finally stopped using our design, but the evidence of their misbehavior is permanently archived in the Wayback Machine (hint: pick a date in 2004 and compare with my company’s site). In fact, the Wayback Machine is quite useful in that it can serve as indisputable proof of who is the source and who is the copy: whichever site shows the design in use before the other is the source.

The way I see it, you have five options for dealing with an infringer:

• Do nothing,
• file a DMCA infringement notification with Google, to get them yanked out of Google,
• contact the infringing company’s CEO,
• “out” them on your blog
• have your lawyer send them a nastygram.

I have to admit that we’ve often done nothing, just because we’re so busy. Eventually they’ll redesign (maybe pinching another design from somewhere else?). Of course that’s not a great option if you’re serious about protecting your IP (intellectual property) rights.

With our most recent infringer, we’ve taken a more active role. We spoke to their CEO. He asked for 2 months to redesign, which we’ve granted them.

So, what would you do? What’s the most legally correct response? The most pragmatic response?

Filed under: Blogs Corporate Sites | Email to a Friend | Printer-Friendly | No Comments »

Spread the word:      

Just read this awesome post from Chris Smith of Verizon Directories (SuperPages.com), where he lays out his criteria for selecting an SEO firm to work with. In summary (I’m paraphrasing here), the SEO agency…:

• should have longevity and track record of at least somewhat related work
• should not have promoted itself using unrealistic promises and representations
• should have a clean record (no black-hat methods)
• should not have tried to impress with a cursory 5-minute site assessment leading to naive recommendations
• should not have insulted our technical work
• should not have made claims of secret methods/knowledge
• should have priced their services reasonably
• should have posted information on their website about the companies/sites they’ve done work for
• should have demonstrated strong technical work on their own site as well as clients’ sites
• should have good people and make that evident on their company site
• should have projected a professional demeanor
• shouldn’t have pestered or been hard-selling
• should be flexible in legal contract negotiations, once selected

Good stuff! Read Chris’ full article: “How major companies choose SEOs”.

(Disclaimer: yes, Verizon SuperPages.com is a client of ours, and no we don’t wear sandals to business meetings.)

Filed under: Blogs Corporate Sites SEO | Email to a Friend | Printer-Friendly | No Comments »

Spread the word:      

Twelve months after its website redesign, House of Travel saw its onsite sales grow six-fold - results that can be measured in increased traffic to the site and in keyword ranking.

Filed under: Press SEO Web Development | Email to a Friend | Printer-Friendly | 1 Comment »

Spread the word:      

If your company is not at the top of Google’s natural unpaid results, particularly for keywords you should be there for, it’s a worry - not just to you but to your customers.

Filed under: Press SEO | Email to a Friend | Printer-Friendly | No Comments »

Spread the word: